witless worm header logo
google
worm jar movie

witless worm

home awesome mixtape podcast pick it up2 videos social worm network the void witless wiki worm zine

odd dirt

conversations with smoot confidential information dead pool journal of patrick mail nfl predictions no time for tv petac short stories songs spider-man & i viking lucky charms contest viking of the year

rants & reviews

book worm breakfast directions drunken concert fists of fury moral debates movie radio television

wormholes

400 cedar productions a fistful of breakfast breakfast of champions bunny bios choose your own adventure hawesome software imagined vacations overheard friends witless sports

merch

store tip jar

about the authors

about faq site news site map site search worm 1 worm 2

contact

email webmaster sign guestbook view guestbook mail bag mailing list
rss 2.0 feed
rss podcast feed
css 2.0 valid
xhtml 1.1 valid
last touch: 01.21.2010
email sign up
tip jar
tip jar
$4.99 per month
new content
featured content
12.21.2007: conversations with smoot
12.12.2007: awesome mix tape podcast
11.17.2007: am i the anti-charm?
11.08.2007: four letter words
10.04.2007: presidential fun facts
09.21.2007: a fistful of breakfast
09.07.2007: 2007 viking of the year
09.06.2007: 2007 nfl predictions
07.17.2007: i hate espn
07.16.2007: spider-man & i
07.15.2007: fantastic four 2
07.08.2007: transformers
07.07.2007: spider-man & i
07.06.2007: spider-man & i
03.02.2007: conversations with smoot
01.25.2007: 2007 dead pool
11.21.2006: good samaritan
11.10.2006: paul is dead
11.02.2006: worm 11 political ad
10.25.2006: where's my mix tape
09.22.2006: fictional trivia about snl
09.15.2006: heinous used for good
09.13.2006: breaking up with charlize
09.13.2006: battlefield earth
09.05.2006: willie offord tree
09.05.2006: 2006 viking of the year
09.03.2006: foodtopia
08.04.2006: cat borne parasite
08.01.2006: short bus
07.21.2006: greatest game never played
07.11.2006: ode to west virginia
07.07.2006: football movies
06.29.2006: flavor country
03.10.2006: fistful of fortune cookies
03.01.2006: occupancy fee
02.14.2006: f valentine's day?
02.02.2006: integrity?
01.20.2006: embracing your inner g
01.06.2006: 2006 dead pool
11.04.2005: what if jay-z
10.27.2005: 10 punches, 1 drink
09.15.2005: viking lucky charms contest
09.09.2005: 2005 viking of the year
08.14.2005: swirling
08.14.2005: birthday card
08.14.2005: last stand of an american
02.14.2005: st. valentine adventures
07.30.2004: 2004 viking of the year
07.09.2004: for molly
07.09.2004: mr c
07.09.2004: the asshole
07.09.2004: the couch
07.09.2004: vincenti
07.09.2004: the phone talks to me
07.09.2004: warm apple pie
07.09.2004: i used to be vanilla ice
10.21.2003: 2003 viking of the year
loading...
meebo chat
loading...
On Tom Cruise by worm 4

With all the hype surrounding the new baby and the weird Scientology stuff and the new movie being released, I got to thinking about the last time I went to a theater and forked over full ticket price to see a Tom Cruise movie. And I just couldn't remember when that was. I may have paid to see the first Mission Impossible, but I really have no recollection of ever doing so and don't remember if the release of such a movie would have intrigued me that much at the time.

Days of Thunder is probably the only Cruise movie I can think of that would be worthwhile to see in the theater. (Did Nicole Kidman get naked in that? It's been too long.) But I didn't see that until it was out on video. Nope, I have to go all the way back to Top Gun, and I'm pretty sure that a law was passed sometime back in the mid 80's that required everyone to see that one.

It's not that I've had anything against Tom for the past 20 years, nor do I really despise him now. Sure, he's a smug religious kook with a Napoleon complex and no (zero) sense of humor who surrounds himself with yes-men and lackeys, but there are plenty of people like that in this world. He could just as easily be the waiter whose pants are a little too tight; the one who never looks you in the eye and recites the specials just a little too quickly before rolling his eyes at your uninspired menu choice. And it's not that he's a bad actor... he's just not a great actor. His looks are just typical and unspectacular enough that he can pull off pretty much any role and at least be respectable (except comedy - Top Gun is probably his best comedic performance to date).

Maybe it has something to do with his choices of movies. Minority Report was a decent movie, but if anyone other than Spielberg directed it, you would only be able to see it on the Sci-Fi channel. The Last Samurai was just an offensive premise - a white alcoholic American washes out of the post-Civil War era military and goes to Japan where he immediately revolutionizes and dominates the centuries-old way of the Samurai? Really? And the roles he takes just for a shot at an Oscar are even worse. He seems to operate under the assumption that altering the length/color of his hair qualifies as going above and beyond. Sure, he can occasionally pull it off, but no viewer will ever look at the screen and think anything other than "That's Tom Cruise."

With that being said, I forked over $8.50 (prices went up again?) on Friday night and saw MI:3 with the Mrs. If you don't want the plot spoiled, stop reading here - the premise of this movie is exactly - exactly! - the same as this season of 24. Mid-level IMF agent hooks up with evil international arms dealer to get some type of generic pocket sized doomsday weapon to Middle Eastern terrorists so that America can attack said terrorists, find weapon, and justify a war to benefit the military industrial complex. Replace mid-level IMF agent with President, replace "pocket sized" with "fits in a truck," and make the super villain (who's dumb enough to go along with the plan in MI:3) more realistic and threatening, and you've got 24, starring another kook with a Napoleon complex. Seriously, I paid money for this?

And all the critics talk about how Philip Seymour Hoffman as the villain makes the movie. And sure, he spits his lines with a nice understated intensity, but is he really a bad guy? How does a bad guy just waltz into the Vatican? How can a bad guy just make phone calls to IMF agents without his calls being monitored and traced by every intelligence agency in the western world? If my memory serves, he only kills one person in the movie, and that was his own interpreter. (And how convenient that he goes to Italy with a chinese interpreter and happens to run into a hot chick who speaks... wait for it... chinese!) By comparison, Tom's girlfriend/wife kills two guys, including the real villain, within 30 seconds of first touching a gun.

Don't get me wrong, the movie is entertaining. It looks and feels exactly like an episode of Alias (same director), and I've never seen an entire episode of Alias. Two big thumbs up for what they did with Keri Russell's eyes when she died and for putting a scene in the middle of the movie to develop the love story while further complicating things with a quickie wedding - it provided the perfect bathroom break for me and like 10 other guys in the theater.

I'm kinda hoping, though, that Tom's ego takes over the way it did after the first MI movie so that MI:4 just involves Tom driving a motorcycle through flames for 2 hours. Now THAT I'd pay money to see.